Using argumentCollection And Overriding Arguments

I ran some test code the other day just to make sure that I correctly understand how arguments passed in to functions in CFML work. If you know everything there is to know about functions and arguments in ColdFusion, then feel free not to read the rest of this. But, if you're curious...

Here is the code:

<cfoutput>
   <cffunction name="ExtraArgs" access="public" returntype="string">
      <cfargument name="Arg1" required="false" type="string" />
      <cfargument name="Arg2" required="false" type="string" />
      <cfargument name="Arg3" required="false" type="string" />
      <cfargument name="Arg4" required="false" type="string" />
      <cfif structKeyExists(arguments,'Arg4')>
         <cfreturn arguments.Arg4 />
      <cfelse>
         <cfreturn 'undefined' />
      </cfif>
   </cffunction>
   <cfset args3 = {Arg1='value1', Arg2='value2', Arg3='value3'} />
   <cfset args4 = {Arg1='value1', Arg2='value2', Arg3='value3', Arg4='value4'} />
   <br/> 1) #ExtraArgs(argumentCollection=args3)#                   <!--- output = "undefined" --->
   <br/> 2) #ExtraArgs(argumentCollection=args4)#                   <!--- output = "value4" --->
   <br/> 3) #ExtraArgs(argumentCollection=args4, Arg4='SomeOtherValue')# <!--- output = "SomeOtherValue" --->
</cfoutput>

All of the arguments are specified as 'not required' with no 'default' value. The function looks for the existence of the fourth argument and either returns that or the string "undefined".

The first time it is called with the "args3" struct that omits the "Arg4" argument, it returns "undefined".

The second time it is called with the "args4" struct, which contains "Arg4", it returns "value4" (the value of "Arg4" in the args4 struct).

The third time it is called with the "args4" struct and also the "Arg4" argument in addition to that, it returns "SomeOtherValue". This, I think, is the most interesting one. With this behavior, you could store structs containing the default arguments for certain operations, and then call those operations overriding defaults as needed.

Die Spammers Die! (Painfully Please)

My blog has been absolutely hammered with comment spam lately. If any of you were subscribed to any of those comments and were forwarded the offensive spam, I am very sorry.

Fortunately, one of the bots wasn't submitting something correctly. So, instead of getting a few thousand spam comments I got a few thousand error emails. :-(

Anyway, I just took the time to add CFFormProtect to my comment form. It was super easy. There was really no excuse for me not to do this sooner. So, again, I apologize.

Just to show you how easy it is, here is the implementation code from the docs.

Put
<cfinclude template="/cfformprotect/cffp.cfm">
somewhere between your form tags.

<!--- On your processing page include the following code: --->
<cfset Cffp = CreateObject("component","cfformprotect.cffpVerify").init() />
<!--- now we can test the form submission --->
<cfif Cffp.testSubmission(form)>
<!--- The submission has passed the form test. Place processing here --->
<cfelse>
<!--- The test failed. Take appropriate failure action here. --->
</cfif>

Of course there are lots of things you can do to customize it's behavior. But, that is the basics. So please go checkout CFFormProtect for all your 'spam form submission' needs. Because, seriously, Captcha is the suck.

Real World AJAX Presentation Code

Last night I presented my "Real World AJAX" talk to PDXRIA (our local Portland Adobe User Group). I said I would post the code. So, here it is! (Download link below)

I have included the PDF slide presentation too. There are not a lot of slides. This is a code heavy talk. It uses a very simple CRUD application to demonstrate adding AJAX to an existing application. There are three versions in the zip. One completely paged based. Another one with some 'partial page update' style AJAX to improve the user experience. And a final one with some DHTML and DOM building. The code uses an in memory query object instead of a database. So, you should be able to drop it in a folder and run it with no setup.

When I give the presentation, I show how you can turn JavaScript off and the second version still works (it gracefully degrades). I really need to add about 10 more slides with some of the stuff that I ramble off while I'm showing the code examples. If I get around to polishing it off, I'll re-post the updated slides and code.

Also, I built the slides in OpenOffice.org Impress. If you would like to give this talk to your user group, or somewhere else, let me know.

Database Abstraction With Illudium and onMissingMethod()

This is the long overdue wrap-up post in my series about using Illudium outside it's Flex front end as a service to generate CFCs.

To recap: I explained why I was doing this and with these tools. Then I showed how you could call Illudium outside of it's Flex front-end. And I showed how we could bundle that generation code up into a CFC.

So, here's where it really gets fun. Now, I can generate CFCs to whatever specification that I need. But, I definitely do not want to be writing a bunch of CreateObject()s everywhere with hard coded paths to beans and Gateways. So, I decided that a dbService (service object to hide the implementation details of my database CFCs) would be a very good idea. I also decided that, like Reactor, I would do run-time generation to speed up developing code for new tables.

I also decided that I would create an API where methods have the name of the table in them (like getUserGateway(), getNewUser(), and getUserByID(userid). This is made possible by the onMissionMethod() method of CFCs in ColdFusion 8. The code for that is below. There is a lot going in it. So, take a look and we'll talk about it below when you're ready.

<cffunction name="onMissingMethod" access="public" returntype="component"
         hint="Secret sauce that makes (get[thing]ByID(thingID),getNew[thing](),get[thing]Gateway()) method calls work.">

   <cfargument name="missingMethodName" type="string" />
   <cfargument name="missingMethodArguments" type="struct" />
   
   <cfset var table = "" />
   <cfset var argsList = "" />
   <cfset var args = {} />
   
   <cfif left(missingMethodName,6) EQ 'getNew'>
   
      <!--- New empty record --->
      <cfset table = mid(missingMethodName,7,len(missingMethodName)) />
      <cfreturn getBean(table).init() />
      
   <cfelseif left(missingMethodName,3) EQ 'get' AND right(missingMethodName,4) EQ 'ByID'>
      
      <!--- Record object loaded from DB --->
      <cfset table = mid(missingMethodName,4,len(missingMethodName)-7) />
      <cfset argsList = StructKeyList(missingMethodArguments) />
      <cfif listLen(argsList) GT 1>
         <!--- Multiple Arguments: just pass them through --->
         <cfset args = missingMethodArguments />
      <cfelse>
         <cfif argsList EQ "1">
            <!--- Single Positional Argument: Try to create PK by convention --->
            <cfset args[getPKForTable(table)] = missingMethodArguments[argsList] />
         <cfelse>
            <!--- Single Non-Positional Argument: Pass it through --->
            <cfset args[argsList] = missingMethodArguments[argsList] />
         </cfif>
      </cfif>
      <cfreturn getBean(table).init(argumentCollection=args).load() />
      
   <cfelseif left(missingMethodName,3) EQ 'get' AND right(missingMethodName,7) EQ 'Gateway'>
      
      <!--- Table Gateway Object --->
      <cfset table = mid(missingMethodName,4,len(missingMethodName)-10) />
      <cfreturn getGateway(table) />
      
   <cfelse>
      
      <cfthrow type="dbService.UnhandledMissingMethod"
             message="Method (#missingMethodName#) was called on com.dealerpeak.dbService and I don't know how to handle it." />

      
   </cfif>
</cffunction>

Hope I didn't loose you. This method is using some simple string functions to determine what type of object the caller wants back and for what table. Then it makes calls to utility methods that do the work. For example, say I have a handle on an instance of the dbService in a variable called 'dbService'. If I call this code "user = dbService.getNewUser()", then the onMissionMethod calls "<cfreturn getBean(table).init() />". And getBean() looks like this.

<cffunction name="getBean" access="public" output="false" returntype="component"
         hint="Given a table name, return an instance of a bean. (w/ runtime CFC generation).">

   <cfargument name="Table" required="true" type="string" />
   <cfset var beanPath = getCFCPath(arguments.Table) />
   <cfset var bean = {} />
   <cftry>
      <cfset bean = CreateObject('component',beanPath)._setDBService(this) />
      <cfcatch>
         <!--- Runtime Generation --->
         <cfset generateCFCs(arguments.Table) />
         <!--- Return bean --->
         <cfset bean = CreateObject('component',beanPath)._setDBService(this) />
      </cfcatch>
   </cftry>
   <cfreturn bean />
</cffunction>

I'm sure you can guess what the other utility methods for Gateways and DAOs look like based on that. You can also see how the runtime generation of CFCs occurs. Also, each object instantiated, gets a pointer back to the dbService.

Early on I decided that I wanted all of the SQL in the Gateways and DAOs. But, I wanted the beans to expose an Active Record like API for persistence operations. So each base bean (that will always be over-written when regenerated) has load(), save(), and delete() methods. Take a look below at how one of those works.

<!--- Convenience method so bean can save itself --->
<cffunction name="save" access="public" returntype="component" output="false"
         hint="Convenience method so bean can save itself. Calls out to dbService.">

   <cfargument name="LoadAfterSave" type="boolean" required="false" default="true" />
   <cfset variables.dbService.getDAO(variables.TableName).save(this,LoadAfterSave) />
   <cfreturn this />
</cffunction>

I won't go any farther into the details of how I customized the generated CFCs. I'll let you do your own exploration there. It has been a very iterative process. And I'm still tweaking my generator templates.

I hope you get some good ideas from this series. Please remember, this is only one way of doing it. Work politics forced me to do it this way. But, now, I'm glad that I got the chance. In the future when I'm using Transfer or Hibernate, I will appreciate how much work went into making them so flexible and powerful.

SQL Server - Insert Not Working

Just wanted to share a bit of fun I had yesterday. (Actually it wasn't very fun). I had a cfquery that was supposed to copy "Template" records linked to one entity inserting them linked to another entity. So, the file was using an Insert/Select. Never seen one? OK, it looks like this.

<cfquery datasource="#request.DSN#">
      INSERT INTO
         [Template]
         (
            TemplateName,
            OwnerID,
            ...
         )
      SELECT
         TemplateName,
         <cfqueryparam value="#attributes.Target_OwnerID#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer">,
         ...
      FROM
         [Template]
      WHERE
         OwnerID = <cfqueryparam value="#attributes.Template_OwnerID#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer">
         ...
   </cfquery>

So, we can all agree that insert/select is a great thing. However, this particular one was not working (on the live server). I tried the normal things. I cut the SQL from the .cfm and pasted it into SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS), replaced the params with the values I knew it would be using and ran it (inside of a transaction, of course). Guess what? It worked. So, it works running in SSMS but, not in a cfquery. Hmmm... So, next, I added an "output" clause to the insert/select. That way I could see any records it would be inserting, just to make sure it really wasn't inserting them. Then I added a cfdump that would only run for me. "What's an output clause?" you say. Here I'll show you.

<cfquery name="insTemplates" datasource="#request.DSN#">
      INSERT INTO
         [Template]
         (
            TemplateName,
            OwnerID,
            ...
         )
      OUTPUT
         INSERTED.*
      SELECT
         TemplateName,
         <cfqueryparam value="#attributes.Target_OwnerID#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer">,
         ...
      FROM
         [Template]
      WHERE
         OwnerID = <cfqueryparam value="#attributes.Template_OwnerID#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer">
         ...
   </cfquery>
   <cfdump var="#insTemplates#" label="insTemplates" />

I ran that and guess how many records were inserted... 0. At this point I'm a bit frustrated. But, it begins to dawn on me that I've seen similar behavior before from SQL Server. There are time when the SQL Server will cache a bad plan for some SQL. In these cases, you can either have the database flush it's entire plan cache or you can alter the SQL enough to force it to make a new plan for your SQL. So, I added "AND 1=1" to my "where" clause.

Guess what? It works now.

This is a fairly edge case. I have not seen it very often. But, if you are positive that a cfquery is not returning what it should, before you jump out of your office window, try adding something innocuous to your "where" clause.

If it does work, feel free to send some happy thoughts my way and curse MS under your breath. :-)

I'm an Adobe UG Co-Manager!

As part of a new Adobe initiatives user groups are supposed to have co-managers. So, I will be the new co-manager for the PDXRIA group. The title feels a little like "Assistant to the Regional Manager" ;-). And in more exiting news, Simeon Bateman will be stepping back up as the main manager.

We will both do our best to provide engaging presentations and valuable opportunities for networking. For more details see Simeon's blog.

P.S. I'm going to try and blog more often.

More Entries

BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.6.002.